Law Philosophers Assignment

Philosophers appellative Aristotle was born(p) in 384 B. C. E until 322 B. C. E. He was a Greek philosopher who lived in Stagira in north Greece. He was the son of Nichomachus, Aristotle studied medicine and so in 367 BCE he was whence sent to capital of Greece to study philosophy. He has stayed and studied at Platos academy until 347 BCE, he had a various idea then Plato. Aristotle believed The just therefore means that which is fairnessful and that which is extend to or fair(Morris, 1981) When Plato had died Aristotle was not the head of Platos Academy.Aristotle left Athens he went travelling maybe studying in Turkey, which used to be called Asia Minor. In 338 he returned back to Macedonian and had tutored horse parsley the Great, later Alexander the Great had taken over Athens, Aristotle had returned to Athens to setup his own direct called Lyceum. After Alexander the Great passed away Athens attacked Macedonian and Aristotle policy-making situation became risky. He fled away and went to Eubroea where he has later passed away in 322 B. C. E. Aristotle believed in egalitarian society were he believed that every single should sh are equally.He believed that if quite a little are unequal they may be allotted unequal shares (Morris 1981). Thomas doubting Thomas was born in Lombardy, Italy in 1225 and later passed away in 1274 he lived only 49 years. He was born in his familys castling in the kingdom of Naples, he had eight siblings and he was the youngest of them all. At the term of five he had been drawn into a school at Montecassino. He was later transferred to University of Naples. He came into contact with Aristotle, and became a Domini send packing over the disputes of his family and then he headed north to study.Briefly in Paris, and then he went onto a unalike school called Cologne were he was with Albert the Great, he later studied engineering science at the University of Paris he became an expert in philosophy and in other works of Aristotl e. He believed that Law is chiefly ordained to the communal undecomposed and intention of righteousnessmaker should be to lead man to virtue (Our Legal Heritage, 92) He did not assume that law makes people safe(p), just now rather that man obeys a law due to him world good(Philosophers of Law, Note) Noam Chomsky is born on December 7th, 928 in Philadelphia he was Jewish born philosopher who had earned his PhD in linguistics at the University of Pennsylvania. Since 1955 he was a professor at MlT and had made great theories on human linguistic ability. Chomsky had a little brother named David his family was a middle class family. Noam Chomsky grew up observation officers beat wo custody in front of a textile pile. His mother Elise Chomsky was an supple radical politic in the 1930s his father William Chomsky who was a Russian Jewish Immigrant. Chomsky at the age of ten years old had create verbally a newspaper editorial on the rise of fascism in Europe.He believes that law p rimarily serves those in power. Cooperation between the rich class and of citizens and lawmakers to make laws that observe the statuesque and wealth and power of the rich. Aristotle would evaluate Canadian Law is he would like how we have the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms he would like incision 15 sub particle (1) in the Charter which is Equality Rights every private is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection department and equal benefit of the law Constitution Act, 1982).This jibs with Aristotle because he also give tongue to that everyone is equal and should be set the same. Also he would agree on parting 7 of the Charter Legal Rights Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security(Constitution Act, 1982). Aristotle would agree with this because it shows that everyone has the equal rights for life and humanity. He would agree that taxing the wet would be good because it lessens the chance of them overruling.He believes that everyone should be treated equally, so in Canadian law the same cases cant be treated the same way as other. He would believe that Canadian law would be a trouble because he wants everyone to be treated the same. He would also resist with welfare because it takes away our money that we earned by working hard for. He would also have a problem with one ruler drumting elected because of false information world used to be a ruler of a country. Aristotle would believe that our laws our good and it could be bad at the same time.Thomas Aquinas would believe that the Canadian law would improve or expand on his theories of people. In section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms the rights and leave officedoms set out in it flying field only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society(Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982). He would agree with this because it shows that man can be free still it is up to them if they want to obey the law.It is basically stating Aquinas theory that man obeys a law due to him being good it is a guideline to say you are free exclusively remember there are laws if you do something wrong. He would disagree with Canadas legal system because he was a big believer in his faith, which was Christianity he would agree much on the ten commandments because they show one ruler and they say that you cant do this or that so they are laws that over rule men. Which didnt agree with his theory that men obey law and law doesnt obey men.Noam Chomsky would evaluate Canadian Law as positive and negative thing because it shows that media is controlled by the political science and also by the wealthy. Noam Chomsky believed that media only benefits the elite class. He believes that the rich should get richer and the poor get poorer. Under section 15 sub section 1 equal benefit of the law without discrimination basically Noam Chomsky would agree with this because it show s that everyone should be treated the same but dont classify if you are poor or rich.Chomsky believes that the media only benefits with the elite class but in Canadian Law he might disagree liberty of speech because the media is controlled by the rich and whatever the rich say goes it could be false information, but with freedom of speech you can go to people and spread the word. Everyone has the right to speak and also he might disagree with the Canadian government for spending money funding Iraq and other countries. Noam Chomsky a 20th and 21st century philosopher he is still alive so he can compare the difference between his theories and the Canadian Law.Citations Blair, A. , Ryan Elliott, K. , Manning, B. , & Mossuto, M. (2004). Canadian and international law. Canada Oxford University Press. McGilvray James, A. (1994). Noam chomsky . Retrieved from http//www. biography. com/people/noam-chomsky-37616 McInerny, R. (Sept, 2009 30). Metaphysics research lab, csli, stanford univers ity. Retrieved from http//plato. stanford. edu/entries/aquinas/ Waggone , B. (2000, June 09). University of california museum of paleontology. Retrieved from http//www. ucmp. berkeley. edu/history/aristotle. hypertext mark-up language