Tuesday, March 26, 2019
The Economics of Federal Defense Policy :: Political Science
Three out of four Americans polled in the 1992 election year believed that the United States was heading in the wrong direction. With  much(prenominal) an overwhelming consensus, the country hired a new president to  go about to fix the vital issues at hand. Although both Republicans and Democrats believed that the United States was still the  touch on superpower, the  plenty of the United States saw that their quality of life was deteriorating. In fact, the signs of economic, social, and political decay were undeniable.For example, the wages of production workers in America  fill declined twenty pct in the last twenty years  collectable to large corporations shifting their operations overseas. Over thirty-seven  jillion Americans argon without health insurance due to its exploding costs. There are about  sixty million people below the poverty line fourteen million of which are children. Our crime rate is at an all-time high as well as the population in our prison system. The United    States has  19 preceding nations that have lower infant mortality rates. Among the twenty  more or less developed countries in the world, the United States has the highest divorce rate and the highest teen  motherhood rate. The most incredulous fact of all is that the Pentagon continues to absorb twenty percent of the federal budget-over a third of which is spent protecting Europe against an  adversary that no longer exists.In fact, that is the most probable source of Americas problems the budget. forty-seven percent of the national federal budget is spent for a  soldiers expense. The  topic Defense, the topic of this paper, is what is stealing money from the poor in our  possess country and lessening our status as the sole superpower of the world. The National Defense was a program initiated from day one of the United States existence. It was a program designed to protect the people of the world, but primarily the people of this nation. It was designed to protect human rights and t   he ideals of democracy and capitalism. However, in lieu of  novel events, the use for such a program is now debatable. The world has changed  significantly and dramatically within the last five years. The threat of an evil  imperium such as the Soviet Union is no longer the  cutting War is over. Ultimately, demilitarization is needed for many reasons. Both Democrats and Republicans alike supported the  victimisation of a gigantic-industrial complex. Both are content with only  small budget reductions.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment